During my master’s degree program in Clinical Psychology,
I took a course in family therapy. One of our assignments was to interview an
older couple who had been through various stages of their marriage. I
interviewed my parents. My dad would have been about 60-years-old at the time
of the interview. My dad said that he wanted to marry my mom, in part, because
she was intelligent and had a good head on her shoulders. “She seemed to know
what she was doing.” My mother reacted with some surprise to his comments. They
both told me a nice account of their early days together.
My dad said that he thought he had made one major mistake
when they first got married, and if he could do it over, he wouldn’t make the
same choice. He said that as a newly married couple, they rented an apartment
along with another couple. The two couples lived together in the one apartment.
The other couple had a young child and the father disciplined by spanking with
a belt. Neither of my parents approved of this approach. After seeing this
happen repeatedly, on one occasion, my father confronted the man. My mother
proudly reported, “Your Dad told him to stop hitting that boy with a belt and
if he saw it happen again, he would pound the guy!” There was tension between
the two couples until they were able to separate. Looking back, my dad assessed
that their bonding as a couple was hindered by the presence of other people.
There was a lot of tension in my parents’ marriage by the
time I was growing up. This had developed over years. There is a psychological
diagnosis, Reactive Attachment Disorder (RAD), which comes about when an event
in a person’s early childhood years seriously disrupts the normal development
of bonding between parent and child. This event could be an illness, separation
from the parent, abuse, or anything that could be experienced as traumatic. For
my mother, it was the death of her father when she was age five. RAD manifests
as a difficulty to form stable relationships and to bond with another. The
normal, age appropriate stages of development are disrupted. It can severely
impair a person’s functioning from family to employment to community. I don’t
believe my mother would meet the clinical diagnosis. She certainly bonded with
each of her three children and she did remain in a stable marriage for almost
40 years and was stable in her employment. I could only say that she had traits
of RAD. My mother painfully doubted my father’s love for her and frequently
lamented to me that he didn’t with various examples of less than sufficient
care for her. I would try to reassure her that he did (Of course he did,
right?!) The insecurity wasn’t just in my mother. My dad admitted during a
confrontation by her that he indeed didn’t say the words, “I love you.” He said
to her, “You know I have trouble with that.” She was not happy to just accept
that as good enough. My dad restricted his emotion, possibly lost touch with the
true experience of a full range of emotion. For example, when given a gift at
Christmas, he would put on an act of a happy reaction. He would say something
like, “Wow!” or “Whee! Great!” but it seemed put-on over a basically flat
response.
Attachment theory describes secure and insecure
attachment. One form of insecure attachment is ambivalent attachment. In observational
studies of young children, this type of insecurely attached child would panic
when the parent went away and would cry for their return. But when the parent
returned, the child would be angry and would reject the parent, would even hit
or kick at the mother. Regardless of my father’s restricted expression of
fondness, my mother generally carried with her a guardedness, a distrust, which
didn’t allow her to relax into the marital relationship. Like the insecurely
attached child, she desperately wanted my father’s love but she frequently
pushed him away with anger. When she was wounded, she would enter into yelling
rampages. My brother said when he and my sister were growing up, my father
would argue with my mother; he would engage. I am eleven years younger than my
brother, 15 years younger than my sister. During my growing up years, he no
longer argued with her. He stayed quiet, clenched his jaw with the muscle in
his cheek bulging from tension, and he would walk away. Evidently, by then, he
had determined it wasn’t worth it.
My mother held onto hurts and slights. There was a story
which when brought up, even many years later, would still rouse her anger.
Early in their marriage, my mother met my father at the door upon his return
home from work. She tried to do the typical 50’s era wife thing of greeting him
with a kiss. His response, “Get away! You’re just like a sticky fly!” Mom’s
response, she never initiated such affection again.
When my brother and sister were little, Mom became angry
at Dad while he was across the street talking with the neighbor. She left the
kids in the house, backed the car out, and yelled at him, “You take care of the kids!” as she angrily drove off. Dad calmly
said to the neighbor, “Guess I’d better go take care of things.” Another time,
she was so angry with him she packed a couple of suitcases and was going to
leave him. I don’t know how he calmed her in that instance. Though he no longer
argued with her directly during my years, he did act as a buffer for me. Mom
was intense. She loved me. I knew she loved me. I loved her. But at times my
Dad would need to step in. For example, when I was about age 14, Mom’s friend,
Phyllis Barth, came to visit along with her high-school-age daughter. Phyllis
dramatically told of her daughter’s recent illness with high fever and severe
dehydration. It almost killed her.
It just happened that I was sick. I tried to go to bed, but became nauseous and
vomited. Mom became adamant that I needed to keep fluids in me so that I wouldn’t
become dehydrated. I drank a little water and threw up. She had me drink water
again and I threw up. Again, despite my protest, she insisted that I drink some
water and I threw up. Somehow, she and Phyllis got the idea that I should have
orange juice. I had some sips of orange juice and threw up. They were still
pushing the drink upon me. We were all in the kitchen with me weakly sitting
and my dad across the room leaning against the counter. As I was being
pressured to drink some more, I looked at my dad miserably. He then arose to my
defense and said, “Leave her alone now. Let her go to bed.” And my mother
followed his direction. This was an interaction that would happen over the
years, my dad stepping in when my mom was going too far. When he passed away,
that was one of the first losses I recognized: I no longer had a buffer.
Also, in my self-awareness, I realize that I learned from
my mother to be guarded and distrustful in relationships. I can be overly
trusting in the goodness of other people, but in regards to being vulnerable
with my emotions, I keep much hidden and maintain a degree of distance. This
was reinforced by watching the course of my parents’ marriage and by the dissolution
of my own marriage. I also restrict my emotions like my dad, generally and
automatically keeping a stoic control over my reactions. Then, in close,
personal relationships, if I feel hurt (and those closest to us can inflict the
most hurt) I react like my mother. I find it interesting that I have developed
defenses by taking on the defenses of my parents in reaction to the hurts they
experienced in childhood. The influence of those hurts extends to the next
generation that didn’t directly experience them. What was my Dad’s early
childhood wound? He was born in 1930. This was the Great Depression and my
grandparents lost their farm that year. They moved into town when my dad was
one-year-old. Possibly my dad took on a style of depression he picked up from
his own parents produced from their substantial loss and combined with a German
stoicism.
My parents did enjoy each other. They were best when they
could go out dancing. My dad was entertained by my mother’s spunk and
rowdiness. They both liked to share interactions or observations from their
days that they could laugh about. Humor was something they had in common. And
they were a team when it came to parenting. They agreed with each other; there
was no playing one against the other. They could set a firm limit. Both were
intelligent and valued education. They had the same values of honesty, loyalty,
perseverance, striving to do one’s best, and being responsible. They were good
parents. They were a good pair.